An Unbiased View of responsibility of finder of goods case laws

An Unbiased View of responsibility of finder of goods case laws

Blog Article

Since the Supreme Court could be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision is reached, therefore the decision from the Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) in the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

A guide to online and print sources of Washington State court opinions, rules, forms, and jury instructions

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252216 Tag:The law enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair on the offender and the Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and from other courts Nevertheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.

The ruling with the first court created case law that must be accompanied by other courts till or unless both new law is created, or maybe a higher court rules differently.

Unfortunately, that was not legitimate. Just two months after being placed with the Roe family, the Roe’s son explained to his parents that the boy had molested him. The boy was arrested two days later, and admitted to owning sexually molested the few’s son several times.

Many of the volumes (which includes more recent volumes than the library's holdings) are also offered online through the Caselaw Access Project.

In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a twelve-year old boy from his home to protect him from the Terrible physical and sexual abuse he experienced suffered in his home, also to prevent him from abusing other children in the home. The boy was placed in an crisis foster home, and was later shifted close to within the foster care system.

We are an independent branch of government constitutionally entrusted with the fair and just resolution of disputes in order to preserve the rule of regulation and to protect the rights and liberties guaranteed via the Constitution and laws with the United States and this State.

163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is very well-settled that even though taking into consideration the case of regular promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has got to evaluate the benefit of all of the suitable candidates and after owing deliberations, to grant promotion to these kinds of eligible candidates who will be found for being most meritorious among them. For the reason that petitioner was held being senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was overlooked from the respondent department just to increase favor on the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy on the part of the respondent department.

The regulation of necessity recognized and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it absolutely was the illegal action called law of necessity..

182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance of the respondents that pensionary benefits could be withheld on account from the allegations leveled against the petitioner, inside our view, section 20 on the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does present for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension could be withheld or reduced. These incorporate if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension might be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. In some cases, a civil servant's pension could possibly be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established with the government.

Any court may search for to distinguish the present case from that of a binding precedent, to achieve a different conclusion. The validity of this kind of distinction may or may not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to the higher court.

156 . Const. P. 1015/2021 (D.B.) Muhammad Saleem Jehangir V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's also important to note that neither seniority nor promotion is definitely the vested right of a civil servant, therefore, neither any seniority nor any promotion could be claimed or granted without the actual length of service on account of vested rights. The purpose of prescribing a particular duration of service for getting to be entitled to more info become regarded for promotion to the higher grade, of course, will not be without logic because the officer that is in the beginning inducted to some particular post needs to provide on the mentioned post to gain experience to hold the next higher post also to serve the public in the befitting way.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming for the main case, It is additionally a perfectly-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is issue to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings around the evidence.